Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurra-yi Khuttali/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by FrB.TG via FACBot (talk) 13 October 2024 [1].
- Nominator(s): Amir Ghandi (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Recently successful GAN (reviewed by Simongraham, this article is about a Princess in the medieval Iran (Ghaznavid dynasty) who is known as the most politically active woman in her era; namely because of writing a letter to induce her favourite nephew to usurp the throne. Amir Ghandi (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments by Llewee
edit- "recorded by Shabankara'i (c. 1298 – c. 1358), a later historian" - I don't think later is really necessary here as we have his rough lifespan. It might create the impression he was latter than Bosworth.--Llewee (talk) 18:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted it
- "According to Bosworth, she was distinguished from her sisters because of her intelligence and tactfulness, which gave her an influential role in the governmental matters. In an era when the education for women was restricted to only theology, she sought to learn sciences."
- The two the's aren't needed and look a bit grammatically awkward.--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted them
- Is any more information available about how she tried to learn sciences?--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately nothing
- The two the's aren't needed and look a bit grammatically awkward.--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- "a patriotist rebellion broke out in Khwarazm on March 1017"
- If the rebels were angry that Khwarazm was under foreign rule then "nationalist" would probably be a more usual term than "patriotist".--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Replaced it
- "In" would probably be a better fit than "on" here.--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- If the rebels were angry that Khwarazm was under foreign rule then "nationalist" would probably be a more usual term than "patriotist".--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- "the rebels killed Ma'mun for his submission" - a better wording for this might be "the rebels killed Ma'mun; objecting to his submission"--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wouldn't specifying that they are 'objecting' be redundant? What about 'because of' instead of 'for'?
- Yes, "because of" should be OK. The original wording just felt a bit vague.--Llewee (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wouldn't specifying that they are 'objecting' be redundant? What about 'because of' instead of 'for'?
- "Furthermore, Hurra may have been taken hostage by them." - I don't think "Furthermore" is needed here.--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delted
- "and the Turkic military commanders" - Could a link be added to "Turkic" here?--Llewee (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- "the real power behind Muhammad's government" - Maybe add a link to Power behind the throne here?
- Done
Image review
- Suggest scaling up the map
- Done
- File:Mas'udIGhaznavidCoin.jpg needs a tag for the original work. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm seeing all these other images of coins (File:Denarius Sextus Pompeius-Scilla.jpg for example) and they have the exact same licenses as this one. Why a tag for original work?
- Other similar images should also have one, but sometimes that doesn't happen. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done
FM
edit- While the article generally looks good, it lacks a lot of context throughout, making it hard for the reader to understand where, how, and why things are happening, but that should be fixable with the suggestions below. FunkMonk (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Link Ghaznavid at first mention in article body, now it's at second.
- Done
- Since the article is so short, I think you can devote some space to explaining non-English terms in-text (in parenthesis), instead of making readers chase links.
- I have done that for the majority of the foreign words. Sultan, Amir and Harem aren't obscure terms and don't need explanation
- "from Ma'munid dynasty" From the.
- Done
- Where was she from and where did she live? The article gives very little geographical context in modern terms. Even your blurb here gives clearer location info than the article itself (medieval Iran).
- Done
- Anything on er ethnicity and religion? Since the article is so short, there is plenty of room for more context. Could be something as simple as saying her dynasty was Muslim of Turkic Mamluk origin or whatever fits.
- Done
- "ruler of Khwarazm" State where this is in modern terms too.
- Done
- "Abu al-Hasan died at an uncertain date between 1006 to 1010" From what?
- Unknown, meaning the source itself doesn't even say 'from unknown causes'
- "However, a nationalist rebellion broke out on Khwarazm" I see this was discussed above, but does this really count as "nationalism"? What does the actual source say? I'm very doubtful that any regional identity of this time could be called "nationalism".
- The source says 'patriotist'
- I think we have to stick to that, because the concept of nationalism didn't really exist back then, so applying it retroactively is WP:OR. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- "broke out on Khwarazm" In?
- Done
- "and repeatedly sent him luxurious gifts" After she was married and moved away? Could be specified, as it gives context.
- The source does not specify
- "In 1030, after Mahmud's death" What did he die from?
- Is this necessary to add?
- Depends on how he died. If he died in battle, it adds context to the story. If he died from disease, not so much. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- THe cause of death was a combination of diseases, so I won't add it
- Depends on how he died. If he died in battle, it adds context to the story. If he died from disease, not so much. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Hurra-yi Khuttali, along with her younger brother" Why randomly give her full name again? Shouldn't be needed after first mention in the article body. Also happens elsewhere in the article.
- Changed all to Hurra
- How many siblings did she have?
- We know how many brothers he had, but for sisters it is unknown. Should I add this into the article?
- If the source specifically states this, yes. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Then no, the source I have only says her father had six sons
- If the source specifically states this, yes. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Who was her mother?
- Unknown
- "receive letters from Hurra and his mother" Who was his mother?
- Unknown
- "may have had him blinded" Could link Blinding (punishment).
- Done
- "with Khorasan in second place" You never explain or link Khorasan before this point, needs context. What does all this have to do with Khorasan?
- Done
- "As a result, Turkoman tribes migrated into the region" From where? You should establish whether these were sent specifically by Mas'ud.
- Done
- "by Beyhaqi" But you haven't presented him before (or here), so the readr doesn't know there have been previous mentions of her by him, or even that he is aparticularly important source about her.
- Done
- "and his throne was usurped by Muhammad" But wasn't he blind? How did he rule, and how long after?
- Only allegedly. Also wrote some information about his second tenure.
- "From a feminist outlook" This could be given in-text author attribution, who speaks on behalf of feminism here?
- Doesn't seem to have been addressed. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Doesn't seem to have been addressed. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- "I and the women of the harem are all in the citadel of Ghazna." This detail could be mentioned in the article body itself, with link to the citadel.
- Done
- "in the Ghaznavid politics" The is unneeded.
- Done
- The intro also needs modern geographical terms for context.
- Done
- "leaving Ghazna for India, her ultimate fate is unknown." The comma should be a semicolon.
- Done
- The intro should mention it's unknown if she had children.
- Done
- Mention in the intro that her husbands were brothers and where they ruled.
- Done for brothers; I've already mentioned that they ruled Khwarazm
- Changes look good, I've added some comments above. FunkMonk (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - looking nice with the added context. FunkMonk (talk) 10:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Coordinator note
editThis has been open for more than four weeks now and has only one general support. Unless there is significant progress in the next three days or so, I am afraid this risks archival. FrB.TG (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's been no progress since my last note, unfortunately so I'm archiving this now, noting that the usual two-week wait before another nomination will apply. FrB.TG (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. FrB.TG (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.