Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kingdom of Hungary (1000–1301)/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Sarastro1 via FACBot (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2017 [1].


Nominator(s): Borsoka (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a medieval kingdom in Central Europe. It received two reviews and underwent a comprehensive copyedit. Thank you for all comments during the process. Borsoka (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Dank

edit

Sources review

edit

The article seems excellently sourced. A couple of points:

  • I'm getting repeated error messages from the link in ref. 2. Maybe it's a temporary fault, but please check it out.
  • The Spinei book is lacking publisher.

No other issues. Brianboulton (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I fixed the above problems ([4] [5]). Borsoka (talk) 13:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Best add a retrieval date to ref 2, since you are citing an online copy rather than the magazine itself.
Fair point. Retrieval date added ([6]).

Closing comment: For some reason, this seems to have struggled to attract reviews. As there has been no progress for over two weeks, despite this being on the urgent list, I'm not sure we can achieve consensus to promote in a realistic time frame on this FAC. I would recommend taking this to back to PR and asking some experienced FAC reviewers to take a look at it away from FAC; the previous reviews were not much help and I think you need more eyes on this. Reviewers are often more willing to engage when work has been done away from FAC, and when there has already been substantial review. I will be archiving shortly, and the article can be renominated after the usual two-week waiting period. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.