Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/No Rest for the Wicked (Supernatural)/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Karanacs 16:15, 20 October 2010 [1].
No Rest for the Wicked (Supernatural) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article candidates/No Rest for the Wicked (Supernatural)/archive1
- Featured article candidates/No Rest for the Wicked (Supernatural)/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Ωphois 19:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it is up to FA standards. Though the article was not promoted last time, it has now been copyedited and improved upon. Ωphois 19:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- All previous supporters/opposers have been notified. Ωphois 19:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 20:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - resubmit my support. I don't believe the article has changed much since my last review, thus I don't have any further issues. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - sources do not appear to have changed significantly from the last FAC. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Ophois will remember my near-oppose last time, so I'm happy to see a fresh copy-edit has smoothed out the prose. Courcelles 08:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Having not previously been familiar with the background of this program, I was a bit worried that as a reader I would come away from the article feeling it lacked context. I was most pleased to discover the opposite. Indeed, the Background sect of the article helps with this greatly. The lede is well-written and serves as a good introduction for the additional contextual information provided later in the article. I would make one suggestion - to break up the first paragraph in the Reception sect in twain - as it might be a bit easier for readers that way. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.