Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Operation Ten-Go

Operation Ten-Go

I believe this article meets the featured article criteria. It has been through peer review and has passed "good article" review. Cla68 20:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Another well-done war article. The only thing I see which could be improved would be a longer lead, but I don't think its imperative. RyanG e rbil10 02:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, excellent article in every respect. Kirill Lok s h in 09:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. - Mailer Diablo 16:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Image problems:
- ~~Image:Yamato2.jpg, Image:Yamato1.jpg, Image:Yamato4.jpg, Image:Yamato3.jpg is tagged as PD-USGov, but there is no indication at the image source that this is true.~~
- ~~Image:Yahagi.jpg is likewise tagged, and its source returns an unauthorised error. It is effectively unsourced.~~
Jkelly 23:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern and I hope I can clear it up. All of those pictures are from the US Government, either the US Navy, National Archives, or another US government agency. Even though the Nova and Combinedfleet websites don't source the pictures, they are from the U.S. government, as they were taken from U.S. military aircraft on a U.S. government military operation which therefore automatically makes them property of the U.S. government, and therefore, if I understand correctly, publicly available, no matter who posted them on the Internet. That's perhaps why those two websites didn't feel the need to source the photos, which, since they are public domain documents, their original source doesn't have to be cited. In Yoshida's book, "Requiem for Battleship Yamato", pp xxxvi-1, pictures "Yahagi.jpg" and "Yamato3.jpg" are clearly labled as being from the U.S. National Archives. In Skulski, "The Battleship Yamato", p. 32, "Yamato3.jpg" is labled as being from "US Defense Audio-Visual Agency." I changed the source of "Yahagi.jpg" to reflect that it's really from the US National Archives, not that website. If anything further is required to fulfill the burden of proof that those photos are from the US government, tell me what you feel needs to be done and I'll try my best to do it.Cla68 01:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just add this information to the Image Description pages. Jkelly 02:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cla68 03:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response, and good luck with the article. Jkelly 03:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent article! InvictaHOG 18:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, with conditions: The article is excellent overall, but a minor presentation problem: many of the photos have bad contrast and/or are unclear when thumbnailed. Eg. Image:Yahagi.jpg, Image:Yamato1.jpg, Image:Yamato4.jpg. Probably nothing you can do, but try resizing and fiddling with contrast on some of them. Also, a minor NPOV nitpick: The sacrifice by the almost 4,000 Japanese sailors during Operation Ten-Go in a brave, selfless, but futile, symbolic effort to defend their homeland. Quoting a comment on my FAC Defense of Sihang Warehouse, "bravery is subjective" ... "portray it as their cultural reception". -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 03:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm totally out of my element when it comes to editing images, but I'll look into doing what you suggest. I understand how you could feel that way about the NPOV on the line you quote. I've changed the line to read, "The story of Operation Ten-Go is revered to some degree in modern Japan as evidenced by appearances of the story in popular Japanese culture which usually portray the event as a brave, selfless, but futile, symbolic effort by the participating Japanese sailors to defend their homeland." Cla68 12:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missed my chance to support, but I wanted to read it first, and was distracted by {{Japan article}}! I have copyedited to reduce overlinking (fire, damage, Spring, battle, leader, ...). -- ALoan (Talk) 11:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]