Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Panzer Dragoon Saga/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2018 [1].


Nominator(s): Popcornduff (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Panzer Dragoon Saga, a 1998 role-playing game for the Sega Saturn. Saga is the most critically acclaimed Saturn game and appears on many lists of the best games of all time, but was released in very limited quantities and few people got to play it.

I nominated the article for FAC recently (previous discussion here), and it was supported by reviewers, but I withdrew the nomination as new sources emerged and I wanted to integrate the new information. The prose has changed, so will need to be reviewed again, but the other stuff (references, images) should be intact. Thanks for your patience, everyone.

Pinging previous reviewers: @Mike Christie: @Casliber: @Deckiller: @Red Phoenix: @SchroCat:, @Ceranthor:, @Aoba47: Popcornduff (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Just read through again, and I see nothing to nitpick. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as my comments were addressed in the previous FAC. Good luck with this nomination. Aoba47 (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support on images and sources, as per my comments in the previous FAC. I did review the sources again and made sure they are all reliable and well documented in the references section. Popcornduff, if you happen to have time and would like to return the favor, I am seeking comments on my FAC for another Saturn title, Sonic X-treme. Thanks, and best of luck. Red Phoenix talk 23:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I was on the verge of a support last time, and there is nothing in the subsequent changes that would stop me now. All good work. - SchroCat (talk)

Support: An engaging and well-written article. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing comment: As I mentioned on the previous FAC, the nominator was the one who identified additional material, and but for that the article would already have been promoted. This was effectively a restart to allow the reviewers to have another look at the changes. That has been done now, and I shall be promoting this shortly. Sarastro (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.