Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion/archive4

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:45, 10 July 2011 [1].

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

Nominator(s): SCB '92 (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because...the article looks complete; this is currently an A-class, but I think it is good enough to be a featured article SCB '92 (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel section is unsourced.
There is a ^{[citation needed]} in Gameplay section.
Reception section needs to be expanded, as per previous FAC, it talks about it being great, about voice, music, but lacks fundamental features, such as, gameplay (e.g. combat), story, graphics.
Isn't Plot section a little too long? Surely all the details there are not essential? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"to create NPCs who could engage in complex activity—such as travelling from town to town every few days or going to church on a certain day—without the chance of execution error." - source?
"In response to the new content, the ESRB conducted a new review of Oblivion, showing to its reviewers the content originally submitted by Bethesda along with the newly disclosed content." - source?
"Bethesda Softworks announced in 2010 that they have been developing and will release the next installment of The Elder Scrolls in 2011." - source? Look for other statements requiring sourcing
Web citations need retrieval dates
Ref 58, 60: publisher? Check for others
Ref 73: formatting
What is AIAS, and why is it bolded?
Why include the wiki in External links
See here for a list of potentially problematic links
What makes this a high-quality reliable source? This? This? This? Nikkimaria (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose and Withdraw - I have seen the history of the article and the nominator has only made one edit to the article. GamerPro64 22:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image Review I resized some stuff, other than that, it's good on images. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.