Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Temptations/archive1

The Temptations

Some issues have recently been worked out on the talk page, and it seems like a great article. This isn't a self-nom, though I've made some non-substantive edits here and there (IIRC, I also wrote the original stub, but I'm sure nothing is left from that). Tuf-Kat 02:33, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Support. Solid article. – flamurai (t) 03:08, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Wow, very nicely done. - Taxman 21:47, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Support. I have one very minor nitpick, mentioned on the talk page, but it doesn't change my vote either way. Jgm 00:27, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Have you changed your mind about the nitpick? Or forget to edit the talk page? Or am I missing it? Tuf-Kat
    • Thought I had, but I was having some save problems yesterday. Will rewrite. Jgm 02:26, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Support - an excellent piece of work (and a great companion piece to The Supremes) Rossrs 13:37, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Excellent. SlimVirgin 20:22, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Support, although the last part of the article is getting rather "listy". Jeronimo 09:11, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Everyking 12:04, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Support Joshuaschroeder 05:47, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)