Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Throat Gaggers/archive1

This is a work of pure genius. I am proud to nominate this article which showcases the very best Wikipedia, and more importantly, pornography, has to offer.Courtney Akins 01:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to AfD. Seriously. Girolamo Savonarola 01:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible oppose bad faith nomination. Article has been proposed for deletion. Gwernol 02:09, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article had previously been prodded, I have instead sent it to AfD. Gwernol 02:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since I was the nomiatrix -- and it was only proposed for deletion by same guy that wrote the last comment.Courtney Akins 02:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Article barely a stub, bad faith nomination, non-notable, information non-verified Canadian-Bacon (contribs) 02:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Obvious bad-faith nom. — NMChico24   04:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator is innocently spamming talk pages with innocouos hello messages. Gee wiz. 'Delete - oh, wait, wrong debate... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strongest possible oppose bad faith nomination. This guy can't be serious.!!!!Rlevse 10:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Guy? Dpbsmith (talk) 02:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Next time someone accuses gays of flaunting their sexuality, I'll have to tell them about the heterosexual Ms. Akins here... --Icarus (Hi!) 02:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]