Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tragic Kingdom/archive3
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:54, 3 October 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): EA Swyer Talk Contributions 17:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC), User:Tezkag72[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
Well, I've finally got around to a third nomination. After a long wikibreak, Tezkag72 and I have resolved the comments brought up at the previous nominations. Tezkag will be along to add his name and comments soon. I'm nominating because I sincerely believe the article meets the criteria and I'll resolve any critism as soon as I can. Third time lucky? EA Swyer Talk Contributions 17:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Technical points: external links are fine, no links to disambiguation page. The one image is valid fair use but needs alt text. Stifle (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've read WP:ALT and I don't know how to add the alt text to the album's infobox because the formatting is different from the examples given in WP:ALT. I'll try to find out. In the mean time, can someone help? -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 14:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at this article's infobox: Ghosts I–IV Spiderone 15:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, thank you! Done the alt-text. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 20:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no further objections and will support. Stifle (talk) 08:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, thank you! Done the alt-text. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 20:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at this article's infobox: Ghosts I–IV Spiderone 15:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've read WP:ALT and I don't know how to add the alt text to the album's infobox because the formatting is different from the examples given in WP:ALT. I'll try to find out. In the mean time, can someone help? -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 14:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Links in quotations need to be removed per MOS:QUOTE and reviews in infobox should be sourced with citations to avoid linkrot per suggestion of the Album Wikiproject. Hekerui (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
Shouldn't the second paragraph of the tour section have citations?bridies (talk) 09:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- I vagely remember the references being removed because the material wasn't likely to be challenged. I have added 4 citations anyway, which should cover everything. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 12:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, looks good now. bridies (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments -
- What makes the following reliable sources?
- Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 34th Street is a magazine, from which I cite a review of the album. No facts are taken from it. The facts from popdose used to be cited from Billboard until their website revamp (and now I can't find or cite anything from it). Will replace everyhit with Chart Stats, which WP:GOODCHARTS lists as reliable. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 23:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
UK chart positions now taken from Chart Stats. The facts taken from Popdose are from an interview with Billboard magazine's Director of Charts. I would cite directly from a page BB used to have on their website but their new website inspires expletives from me. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 23:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll leave this last one out for other reviewers to decide for themselves. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review - The one image in the article, which is fair use, meets WP:NFCC. Awadewit (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 11:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No other images should be needed. Tezkag72 (talk) 23:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 11:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Any other comments, anyone? -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 12:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support but shouldn't references such as 27, 29 and 30 be placed after the punctuation? Spiderone 08:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your support. Due to the large number of references citing chart positions, I have tried to place the refs as near to the information as possible so a reader knows which source to look up. Otherwise some sentences would have half a dozen references after the fullstop. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 14:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Has MOS changed its stance on discouraging the use of decorative quote marks and encouraging block quotes? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.