Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tropical Storm Brenda (1960)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 02:47, 26 June 2010 [1].
Tropical Storm Brenda (1960) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Juliancolton (talk) 13:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With my other featured article nomination at a standstill (I'm a co-nominator, so I hope this is acceptable), I present an article of a lower caliber for consideration. Though relatively short, I feel—as do others, apparently—this entry represents a model for well-organized and -written content on older tropical cyclones. As far as I'm aware, all substantial information is sourced properly, and the article is more-or-less comprehensive. Thanks in advance, Juliancolton (talk) 13:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 15:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources: all sources look OK, no outstanding issues. Brianboulton (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, both. Juliancolton (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I can't find any problems worth mentioning. For me this article fulfils the FA criteria. Esuzu (talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -All I can say is that it is a very good article that appears to meet all criteria. No complaints Mr. R00t Talk 23:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, thanks! I appreciate the support and review of the article. Juliancolton (talk) 23:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - meets FA criteria Dincher (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking a look, Dincher. Let me know next time you have one of those interesting geography articles up and I'll return the favor. Juliancolton (talk) 02:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.