Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Unreal Tournament 2004/archive1

Unreal Tournament 2004

I am an avid player of this game (though I suck at it lol) and I feel that the article is now very well written after what I have done to expand it. It is quite a popular and well-made PC game and it would definitely benefit its community to make featured status. --NicAgent 23:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. FAs should not have stub sections and there is no reference section. I suggest moving to peer review first. Pepsidrinka 23:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. This article has a lot of issues which need to be addressed before it can become an FA:
- The article doesn't have any references, nor is anything cited in-line in the article.
- The article contain too many lists. Over half of the article is lists. Most, if not all, of these lists should be converted into prose if possible.
- The tone of the article is not encyclopedic in many places, and in some places could even be considered POV.
- The quality of the prose is not "Wikipedia's best," there are errors in punctuation and spelling in the article. It needs a complete copyedit first.
- Not all of the images used in the article have appropriate copyright status.

I agree with Pepsidrinka, this should be referred to Peer review first. RyanG e rbil10 23:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object No refs, inline or otherwise. Huge lists of bulletpoints that are anything but prose. Even a quotation right in the lead that is not cited by anything. This article needs heavy, heavy work. Staxringold 19:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]