Wikipedia:Featured article review/Acute myeloid leukemia/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 8:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC) [1].

Acute myeloid leukemia

Notified: MastCell, Tom (LT), Spicy, Mikael Häggström, Doc James, Роман Беккер, Boghog, Bibeyjj, SandyGeorgia, Ajpolino, WP MED, WP Molecular and Cell Biology, first noticed in 2021

Review section

Discussions on the talk page have noted signficant content issues including datedness; work has occurred but a fair bit still needs to be done and it's been stalled for some time. Its sad to see another one of our preciously few medical FA in this condition. Hog Farm _Talk 04:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed on article talk, and with MastCell, this article is in quite bad shape. There are short choppy sections, the diagnosis section is impenetrable (even for a medical editor) and could probably benefit from being split to a sub-article and summarized back in prose reasonable for a layperson; a copyedit is needed (samples are colloquilisms like that said, most cases rather than referring to individuals, unnecessary use of subsequently, but there is much more); some sections use very dated sources (see Prognosis as one sample); pediatric AML is not discussed; and there are MOS issues throughout. There is an inconsistent citation style (see Buruli ulcer, complete blood count, dementia with Lewy bodies or menstrual cycle for examples of how to clean up citations and provide page numbers). These are only samples; the article needs a thorough overhaul from an experienced cancer person and medical editor, and needs to be brought to a place where a layperson can glean useful information. Recent reviews need to be incorporated (samples only, PMID 32236160 and PMID 34615640, there is more). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, issues persist, minimal engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC - significant work is still needed. Hog Farm _Talk 01:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include currency, prose, sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, 'tis a pity, but has not been kept current our brought to standard. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, needs significant work. Hog Farm _Talk 14:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist no progress since move to FARC. Z1720 (talk) 19:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.