Wikipedia:Featured article review/Albatross/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 5:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC) [1].

Albatross

Notified: Jimfbleak, DrKay, Vanamonde93, UtherSRG, Circeus, WikiProject Birds, Version 1.0 Editorial Team, diff for talk page notification (2021-12-01)

Review section

This article's sourcing and verifiability issues were raised in December of last year. There have been edits since, but I'm unsure whether such issues have been addressed sufficiently. The article is too large for a single person to review, but I can stand corrected about that. Furthermore, it's not yet marked as "Satisfactory" in WP:URFA/2020A. Maybe there are other issues that have been overlooked, but I hope they're either not present or already resolved to this date. George Ho (talk) 07:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC); extended, 12:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC if no edits have addressed major issues raised within weeks from this comment. So far, I see just date formatting. George Ho (talk) 08:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Upon taking a quick skim, I don't think the article is far from the FA standards, although there are places for improvement. I'd like a subject-matter expert to trim some of the larger sections or split them into level 3 headings. There's also some citations needed in a couple places. Also, the "Threats and conservation" section could use an update, as the sources are 10+ years old. Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 13:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, no improvements. Moving to FARC does not preclude that someone may still take an interest in the improvements such as mentioned by Z1720. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, the threats and conservation material is badly dated. Hog Farm _Talk 14:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the original FAC nominator, Sabine's Sunbird, hasn't edited here since 2021, perhaps try reaching them by email? FunkMonk (talk) 06:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, structure and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist updates to the article have not been carried out. Z1720 (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - significant updating needed for the threats and conservation section. Hog Farm _Talk 20:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, unfortunately issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.