Wikipedia:Featured article review/Amateur radio in India/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 00:40, 22 May 2010 [1].
Review commentary
editAmateur radio in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: all listed WikiProjects
I was a bit surprised by Wikipedia:Featured article review/Indian Standard Time/archive1 that there were complaints of so many references that didn't match the content, which turned out to be true. This article, also by Nichalp (talk · contribs) is the same; I have removed 6 footnotes that have nothing to do with the content that precedes it, and there is also a problem with "Hamfest souvenir" being used 6 times (not RS) and six dead refs (not-RS websites). Another problem is that a report published in 1979 is used to source statements on the current situation. Status data from 1979 cannot be assumed to be true for 2010. This affects about 6-7 cites. Per the FAC statement and Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_37#Amateur_radio_in_India_on_FAC and Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_39#Amateur_radio_in_India_on_main_page_today. the author quite often liked to tell people how fast he can write FAs, well, the sources in these ones don't check out YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- Featured article criterion of concern are sources YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per nominator; absolutely no one has even tried to improve the article since this started. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, agree with FA criteria concerns, nom issues not addressed. Referencing concerns, concerns of failure of WP:RS. -- Cirt (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.