Wikipedia:Featured article review/Arsenal F.C./archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC) [1].

Arsenal F.C.

Notified: Qwghlm, ChrisTheDude, Mattythewhite, Hashim-afc, Madshurtie, Ed g2s, Footieedit, WP Football, WP England, WP London, talk page notice 2020-12-11

Review section

This is a 2005 FA that was last reviewed in 2010. As noted a year ago on talk, it has image layout and MOS:SANDWICH issues, sporadic uncited text, and breaches of MOS:CURRENT and a lack of context on dates throughout. The star looks saveable to me, if someone will do the work. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some image pruning/rearranging. I'll try and find some time to look over the other points..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

work progressing, these empty sections should have some sort of prose summary:

Former players

For a list of every Arsenal player with 100 or more appearances, see List of Arsenal F.C. players. For record appearance and goalscorer statistics, see Arsenal F.C. records § Player records.

Club captains

Main article: List of Arsenal F.C. players § Captains

Player of the season

Main article: Arsenal Player of the Season Award

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All addressed. I will also continue to look at the other points raised here -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping me when you are all done and ready for a new look, quite busy at another FAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude update ? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia sorry, forgot all about this. I will try and take another look today........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are incomplete citations, non-reliable sources, and a ton of books listed in Further reading that aren't used as sources, while a whole lot of the article is cited to news sources. A sourcing overhaul is probably needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude how is this coming? I see there are still a lot of citation cleanup needs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia TBH I've kinda lost enthusiasm for working on this one........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, sadly, per above. There's still quite a bit of sourcing work needed here. Hog Farm _Talk 17:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Remaining issues largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, sadly, because this article get extremely high page views ... but that is all the more reason it should be watched and maintained, but it is not. Issues not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist; it appears that the issues here will not be addressed. Hog Farm _Talk 14:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist issues still not addressed (t · c) buidhe 03:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.