Wikipedia:Featured article review/BBC television drama/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:28, 17 August 2009 [1].

BBC television drama

Review commentary

Notified: Angmering, WikiProject England, WikiProject BBC

2005 promotion. Major concern is lack of citations, and other concerns include prose, especially in "The modern era" section, and comprehensiveness; cursory Google searches turn up several potential sources of information, such as this, this, and this collection of books. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 17:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I created this article back in the day, but I agree that it is nowhere near the modern featured article standards. I am afraid that I don't really have the time to improve it at the moment, so unless someone else is willing to take on the task, I doubt it will be salvageable. A shame, but I think it's too nebulous a topic to make a Wikipedia article, really, on reflection. Nobody would be screaming out for it to be created if it didn't exist. Angmering (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, comprehensiveness , prose. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ? YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 02:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist Per my above concerns. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per the expressed concerns. Plus no one has worked on the article for quite awhile and there is no sign anyone is going to. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per concerns and lack of progress toward FA status. JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 03:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.