Wikipedia:Featured article review/Buckinghamshire

Article is no longer a featured article

Well over half the article is lists, the rest is almost entirely focused on the history, so it is not comprehensive, and the article has no references. I'm really not trying to be topically focused here, just calling them as I see them. - Taxman 16:28, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

  • Remove - On reflection, it ought to include, at least, a discusion of geography and major towns. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:16, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support removal — Matt Crypto 18:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove - SoM 20:56, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove. I considered nominating this one myself a week or so ago. Definately not comprehensive. Indrian 21:58, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove  =Nichalp (talk · contribs)= 18:20, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Remove. This article is far from comprehensive, I am not too keen on the lists either. Rje 01:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)