Wikipedia:Featured article review/Daylight saving time/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 6:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC) [1].

Daylight saving time

Notified: Eubulides, Time, diff for talk page notification

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because around a month ago, both Hog Farm and SG expressed serious reservations about whether the article continues to meet FA criteria. Among the issues cited was "significant uncited text". (t · c) buidhe 01:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still several uncited parts, but Eddie891 did a lot of good work on this. It looks way better than it did when I noticed it. Some of the uncited stuff can probably be nixed, too. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can do some further clean up tomorrow -- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie891 will you let us know when we should look in here? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia I think this article would need a lot more work than I have the time and ability to put in to get it up to 2020 FA standards. Sorry, but even if I resolve the cn tags it still would only be like C-class-- there's some content that's out of date, some unnecessary focus on comparatively trivial aspects. Unfortunately, I won't be able to do it—on my own, at least—particularly with the other work I've got going on. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for at least trying, Eddie891; Eubulides made a monumental effort a decade ago to bring this article to FA status. Another unwatched FA turns to black goo on the internet :( SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed an outdated diagram and moved a few images around to deal with some MOS:SANDWICH issues. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, Eddie tried, but too many issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC - Valiant effort, but this one's a lost cause. Beyond my ability to fix the remaining issues, as well. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC - not sure if I'm 'allowed' to !vote here, but it would take a herculean effort at this point to bring it back to FA-level. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - FAR section concluded that the issues could not be completely fixed by those currently engaged. There's been no new engagement, so this appears to be doomed to fall by the wayside. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, sadly, recalling the monumental effort by Eubulides to get this featured. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist — would need a lot of work to retain the star, sadly. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.