Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ethan Hawke/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 5:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [1].

Ethan Hawke

Notified: ThinkBlue, WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers

Review section

Noted in May 2022 here, the article falls short of the FA criteria with several notable deficiencies:

The absence of any discussion on Hawke's acting style, artistic approach and public reputation, crucial elements for an actor of his caliber.
Brief mentions of his recent work lack critical examination, overlooking the reception of his performances and the films themselves. While a daunting task, sourcing material from interviews, reviews, and commercial performance analyses would enhance this aspect.
Some statements remain unsourced, such as "Hawke is a member of the LAByrinth theatre company."
If we find someone willing to work on these issues, I can help them find sources. Here are some good examples:

Screen Acting and the New Hollywood: Part 2 of an Interview with Ethan Hawke - you would need a subscription to the magazine to access the full interview. I can provide the file.
Ethan Hawke Praises Method Acting with a Caveat: ‘It’s Crazy’ If You Don’t Act Like a ‘Grown-Up’ on Set
The Many Faces of Ethan Hawke

I sincerely hope we find someone to bring this article up to par. FrB.TG (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC no significant edits since its nomination to FAR. In the acting section, this article will need some summarising of older information while newer information is added into the article. The "Personal life" section suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION. Z1720 (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist no significant edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 16:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, no engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per concerns raised by nominator. Hog Farm _Talk 04:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.