Wikipedia:Featured article review/Flag of India/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 7:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: SpacemanSpiff, Nichalp, SBC-YPR, Zscout370, Yashthepunisher, Ambuj.Saxena, WP India, WP Heraldry and vexillology, noticed in October 2021
Review section
editThis older featured article promotion last formally reviewed in 2010 does not meet the current FA standards. There is uncited text and many of the web sources are of questionable reliability, such as Flags of the World or flaggenlexicon.de. Additionally, the manufacturing section needs rewritten to reflect that code amendment allows for the flags to be made out of polyester now. Hog Farm Talk 20:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There's far too much clean up required at this point and a lot of junk has also crept in over the past few years. In addition, I'd placed a tag to update based on the new flag code. At this point I'm also not online enough to focus on cleaning up this article and bringing it up to FA standards either, and therefore it would need attention from someone else familiar with the subject. I was thinking of bringing it here earlier on, but good that Hog Farm beat me to it.—SpacemanSpiff 03:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC lack of improvement to address issues. (t · c) buidhe 19:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC: minimal edits since nomination, concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 04:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, needs a fair bit of work. Hog Farm Talk 12:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no engagement and needs significant work. Hog Farm Talk 13:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist lack of improvement to address issues (t · c) buidhe 16:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist issues remain, no progress to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 16:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.