Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hey Ya!/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 16:31, 14 May 2013 [1].
Review commentary
edit- Notified: WikiProject Songs, WikiProject Hip Hop
I highlighted some concerns on the article's talk page about two weeks ago and some issues were fixed the same day. No other work was done, so I just made a copyedit myself. However, some of the writing is still confusing, and some parts of the article still lack sourcing (track listings/formats). And a few dead links need to be taken care of. Also, I don't know what makes "Rock on the Net" a reliable source with no editorial policy given. Till 10:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed with the Rock on the Net point. I found the writing okay, but the article still feels a little incomplete research wise. Farrtj (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- FA criteria mentioned in the review section include prose, referencing and comprehensiveness. Dana boomer (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. One month later: very repetitive prose (I saw 'topping' five times in 1 paragraph), 'Rock on the Net' fails WP:RS and unsourced sections (track listing, personnel). Overall, not a depiction of Wikipedia's best work Till 01:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above, none of the problems have been addressed. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Dana boomer (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.