Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of post-Soviet Russia/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 18:30, October 16, 2007.

History of post-Soviet Russia

Review commentary

Notified FA nominator, Wikiproject Russia, WikiProject Russian history

Article has a chronic lack of inline citations, lots of citation tags - the vast majority of sections do not have any citations at all. Fantastic claims without citations like "Most editors and managers are willing to pull an article or to fire a journalist upon an informal request from the presidential administration". Original research like "The word best applied to post-Soviet Russian culture is eclectic. While coming to grips with, and in no way rejecting fully, the Soviet inheritance, Russians reached out to identify with their own pre-Soviet past and embraced, some would say indiscriminately, tendencies from the West."--Miyokan 14:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c), POV/OR (1d). Marskell 11:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove very little, if any, work done on the article; both concerns remain. DrKiernan 11:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove—was it written off the top of someone's head? Seriously under-referenced. Tony (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove — Article makes lots of sweeping claims, which are not supported by any sources. The reflist is a collection of weblinks. Any item in it should have title, authors, name of journal/newspaper/magazine etc. Many statements in the article are not politically neutral (NPOV problems): they mostly express the point of view of those, who have been opposed to reforms. The language is ladden with such words as: "sunk", "futile", "disastrous" etc, which are not neutral themself. In the present form the article is beyound repair and should be rewritten from the scratch. Ruslik 13:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 22:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.