Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lego/archive1

Lego

Article is no longer a featured article

Review commentary

Quite an old FA, appears not to meet important criteria.

lacks inline citations
needs cleanup and better structuring
- has inappropriate (incl. inappropriately capitalized) section titles
- external links coming before references?
- external links awkwardly formatted
- references awkwardly formatted
a trivia section is generally not recommended

Todor →Bozhinov 13:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also - did anybody else notice the self-referentiality? Not kosher...This one needs a fair bit of work. The Disco King 22:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comments - criteria 2. a. and 2. c. aren't met. Also where is the original featured article candidate page where this article was nominated for FA in the first place? I can't find it. LuciferMorgan 13:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk message left at Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Lego. Sandy 21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Main FA criteria concerns are writing and structure (2a) and lack of citations (2c). Marskell 10:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per nom. Todor →Bozhinov 14:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Not Enough sources. Hezzy 20:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nominator and Hezzy. Tony 15:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message left at User talk:TodorBozhinov. Sandy 03:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove, refs, tone and comprehensivness - the history for example could be a much better summary of the daughter article.--Peta 05:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove refs Niz 12:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]