Wikipedia:Featured article review/Swedish allotment system/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Dana boomer 16:22, 28 July 2011 [1].

Swedish allotment system

Review commentary

Notified: Bishonen, Johan Elisson, Peter Isotalo, WikiProject Military history

I am nominating this featured article for review because It was promoted in 2005 and have not kept up to standards, specially in regards to sourcing. The issue was raised on the talk page in December 2009, but since then not much has happened. This is a low traffic article, but it covers a very important phase in Swedish military history. The article is overall well written, and the major problem is just sourcing. P. S. Burton (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

1c certainly but in turn this may also effect 1b.
3 All pics need alt text. File:Gustav Vasa.jpg needs source information and File:Generalmonstring.jpg needs source and author information. Brad (talk) 03:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Alt text is not part of the FA criteria. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are several measurements given in metric without any conversions. Brad (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1c due to lack of citations. 2c on the webcites. 1b/c on demographics (source not competent for claim). 1c on HQRS. Fifelfoo (talk) 02:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sort of inactive but I might have time to fix this since it's mainly just a matter of adding more citations. Just give me a week and a few days or so since next week is exam week... – Elisson • T • C • 15:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elisson, are you still interested in working on this? Hope your exams went well, Dana boomer (talk) 17:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Featured article criteria of concern mentioned in the review section focus mainly on referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delist No effort at all has been made to address the listed issues. Other than two edits I made on 18 May of this year the article hasn't been touched since August of 2010. Brad (talk) 06:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per above. Nobody's touched the article at all. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.