Wikipedia:Featured article review/Swedish emigration to the United States/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 7:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC) [1].
Review section
editI am nominating this featured article for review because of the issues I noticed last year: "The article has some issues with MOS, especially inconsistent referencing. Some citation needed tags. The lead is too long compared to the article body. There is also a striking gap in coverage in that the effects of the emigration on Sweden are not discussed at all." None except lead has been fixed. (t · c) buidhe 04:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Drmies is working on this, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADraken_Bowser&type=revision&diff=1108666365&oldid=1107800599 see discussion. (t · c) buidhe 17:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no work in more than 2 weeks, need to keep it moving. (t · c) buidhe 01:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, stalled, citation tags still present. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it should be removed right away, are there in fact any sources that doucment the effects of Sweedish emmigration on Sweeden itself? Sunriseshore (talk) 15:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- A few examples:[2] [3] [4] [5] The last source lists more. Those are just some of the sources I could find in English; I would expect the majority to be in Swedish. Sources like this could also be helpful updating the article, which goes into too much detail in some areas but also neglects the economic, cultural, and political impact on the US as a whole. As the article talk page notes, the article also overemphesizes cultural factors and de-emphasizes economic ones compared to sources. (t · c) buidhe 15:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no edits in the last month, issues are still present. (t · c) buidhe 16:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - no substantive improvements since early September. Hog Farm Talk 17:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues remain. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no improvements since September, issues remain. Z1720 (talk) 16:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.