Wikipedia:Featured article review/William Goebel/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Acdixon, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Kentucky, WikiProject Biography, WikiProject United States, diff for talk page notification
Review section
editI am nominating this featured article for review because major sourcing issues were identified by RD on talk but never fixed. In particular, the article cites book-length sources without giving a page number. Also, since there have been entire books written about the guy, it's not clear that the present article is WP:COMPREHENSIVE. (t · c) buidhe 03:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC limited edits to the article since the notice was placed on the talk page in April, sources still need to cite specific page numbers. Z1720 (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged as needing citations and needing page numbers since January. DrKay (talk) 13:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist minimal engagement since notice was placed on talk page. Z1720 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Reluctant delist - I hate to see this go, as the page numbers are the main issue and should be an easy fix if someone has the books (I don't, or I'd do it myself). While I hate to see FAs delisted mainly for concerns like page numbers, yeah, I'd probably oppose a current FAC that didn't include specific page numbers for citations. I was really hoping someone would pick this one up and try to save it. Hog Farm Talk 03:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.