Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/€2 commemorative coins
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 11 days, 1 support, 4 oppose. Fail. --MarcK 12:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is current a Featured article, but is properly a list. It's time it was moved to its proper featured content type, this is mostly a processual nom. If you're not sure this should be at FLs, compare List of United States Navy ratings. Circeus 05:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if we've ever done this, or if this is the place to make such a request. I think it's okay as an article, but maybe WP:FAR is the place to start? I haven't a clue. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 06:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I believe this is a list, as well. You have to take this to WP:FAR in order to remove this from WP:FA. Then nominate it here.--Crzycheetah 07:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. This was discussed to death at the FA nomination, consensus was that it was more article than list. —Nightstallion 11:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose then, if a majority believed it to be an article. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 14:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment 90% of this article consists of tables listing stuff. That's a huge sign that it is actually a list.--Crzycheetah 17:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/€2 commemorative coins — Well, many people did think it would be better as a list, but TantalumTelluride and a few others agreed with me; in the end, we agreed it was more article than list. —Nightstallion 10:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I read that nomination before commenting here. I still believe that it is a list. What is the difference between this article and the newly promoted list? It is written in the same format: table followed by prose, table then prose, etc. The main information here is contained in tables; therefore it should be considered a list.
By the way, I think this discussion should be continued at the article's talk page.--Crzycheetah 18:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I read that nomination before commenting here. I still believe that it is a list. What is the difference between this article and the newly promoted list? It is written in the same format: table followed by prose, table then prose, etc. The main information here is contained in tables; therefore it should be considered a list.
- Comment: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/€2 commemorative coins — Well, many people did think it would be better as a list, but TantalumTelluride and a few others agreed with me; in the end, we agreed it was more article than list. —Nightstallion 10:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, simply because there is no need for this nomination. The purpose of featured content, of any kind, is to showcase the best of Wikipedia's work. There is a secondary purpose of recognising the hard work of the contributors. This is already a Featured Article, therefore both those purposes have been served. If someone argues that it doesn't meet the FA standards and it gets de-featured, then fine, bring it back here and I'll happily support it, because the content is excellent. But as it is, while this remains a Featured Article, this nomination is unnecessary. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 16:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I would consider this text an annotated list, but I agree with OpenToppedBus that there isn't a great need to move it. I also think that a text should not be both a featured list and a featured article, although the division between the two may be a bit grey. As long as this is a "FA", I oppose it being "FL". Gimmetrow 00:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]