Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 06:59, 21 September 2010 [1].
Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jaespinoza (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it is acurate and complete, it includes the best performing Latin singles since the Billboard Top Latin Songs chart inception. I'll be glad to receive feedback about it so it can be useful. Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 06:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comment Refs 1, 4, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 26 need publisher. TbhotchTalk C. 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
CommentGood list as usual. My only concern is that bold is discouraged as an indicator; consider using symbols (such as * or #) instead. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Since I am already using color to show the best-performing single of the year, I can take the bold out, without other indicator, what do you think? Jaespinoza (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, we always need a symbol to accompany the color for accessibility reasons. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Supporting, my comments have been addressed. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, we always need a symbol to accompany the color for accessibility reasons. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Since I am already using color to show the best-performing single of the year, I can take the bold out, without other indicator, what do you think? Jaespinoza (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I've looked at this a few times, and nothing is jumping at me. I do wonder if some of the unlinked songs are actually sufficiently notable, but I'm not certain of notability requirements in the field. Courcelles 04:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: "The Year-End charts represents" double plural; 'charts represent'. Only issue I found. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FIXED. Thank you. Jaespinoza (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I see alot of WP:OVERLINK on the article, the artist should only be linked once in the list, remove that. Secret account 02:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Overlinking in tables is permitted if the table is sortable. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok I didn't know, as I rarely participate in FLC, Support Secret account 03:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Overlinking in tables is permitted if the table is sortable. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.