Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Coleman Medal/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Coleman Medal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): – Teratix ₵ 12:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Coleman Medal, one of the most important and keenly-monitored Australian football awards, is given to the Australian Football League player who kicks the most goals in a season. Always hotly contested, many winners are acknowledged as the greatest forwards of all time. The league may have existed since 1897, but the medal has only been awarded since 1981. It's fairly straightforward to write about but there is a surprising amount of interesting information to be uncovered. Jack Collins' disgusted reaction to retrospectively receiving an "inferior" Leading Goalkicker Medal is my personal favourite tidbit. – Teratix ₵ 12:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Another ancient tradition that dates back to 1980. Great effort. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I got nothing. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Drive by comment in one of the footnotes it refers to discrepancies between sources and states that one source says something and the other source "correctly" reports a different value. I don't think this is a NPOV way to report discrepancies between sources, and I doubt that it is verifiable (unless a source states explicitly that the incongruent source got it wrong). Instead, suggest something like "Source A says X, but source B and C say Y." You can also silently drop incorrect entries if it's not controversial and you can verify the correct answer. buidhe 03:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Buidhe: how does this change look? – Teratix ₵ 03:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- That looks fine. buidhe 04:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Buidhe: how does this change look? – Teratix ₵ 03:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I did not identify any issues. Good to see more AFL content at FLC! – Allied45 (talk) 07:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These reviews are a bit shorter than usual, but I didn't find anything objectionable when I looked the article over. Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.