Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daft Punk discography/archive2

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:42, 6 October 2009 [1].

Daft Punk discography

edit
Nominator(s): Remurmur (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox

As far as I can tell, all of the issues brought up during the list's previous nomination were addressed, but discussion died down too quickly and nobody changed their votes. Remurmur (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)

Sources

  • Check the toolbox, there are many dead links.
  • There are inconsistencies. For example, ref 9 has periods in between the URL and publisher, and between the publisher and access date, while ref 27 does not. Basically, the inconsistencies stem from the fact that cite templates are used for some refs but not from others; please make this consistent.
  • Spell out all abbreviations in the publishers.
  • Preferably, citations to publications such as Billboard and Spin should have the name of the publication as the publisher rather than the name of its website. For example, ref 15, which is currently formatted as "Billboard album positions". billboard.com. Retrieved April 12, 2009. should preferably be "Billboard album positions". Billboard. Retrieved April 12, 2009.. Same goes for Spin, Variety and Allmusic (but note that Allmusic is not italicized because it is a website).
  • Web refs should not have their titles in all caps, even if it were like that in the original. Change them to title case.
  • What makes http://www.director-file.com/gondry/news/?p=207 reliable?
  • Likewise http://www.mvdbase.com/tech.php?last=Gardner&first=Tony? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose there's no action to resolve Dabomb's comments above, plus:
    • There's no ref for Canada's chart positions
    • There's no ref for Belgium's chart positions
    • Strongly suggest to ask one of the members of the WP:DISCOG to review this list

--Cheetah (talk) 20:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Daft_Punk_discography/archive2&oldid=1138479392"