Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1975–1989)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
England cricket team Test results (1975–1989) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Harrias talk 20:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The next in the series, follows the format established in the previous FLs. I have hopefully applied all the comments and feedback from those lists into this one, but I'm sure you'll all find plenty to bring up nevertheless! As always, all feedback appreciated. Harrias talk 20:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from - Dank (push to talk) 22:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing. Also, I'll probably claim Wikicup points for the review.
|
- Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 22:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgot to mention: IMO this doesn't need a short description, because the article title covers it, but YMMV. - Dank (push to talk) 14:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd appreciate any thoughts or concerns you might have over at WP:Featured list candidates/Stearn's botanical names (U–Z)/archive1. - Dank (push to talk) 04:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I genuinely can't see anything to pick up on. Nice one -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments I'll add this to my WikiCup submissions.
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"The West Indies were the most successful team in Test cricket," what's the context for this? Over the same period? Preceding that period?
That's all I have. It's a good piece of work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 14:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
* Inconsistent use of the publisher field in the Cite X templates
|
- Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey Guerillero, Is this a source review? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: I think so. I didn't do a dive into if the citations back up the statements, just looking at the overall constancy of the citation style and the reliableness of the sources. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Guerillero, for letting me know, added to awating promotion. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey Guerillero, Is this a source review? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoted. --PresN 18:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.