Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/International reaction to 2008 Tibetan unrest/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 01:11, 24 September 2008 [1].
The lead and content was not considered appropriate for a featured article but was recommended as a featured list. It satisfieI am nominating the list as it satisfies the guidelines on length and content for a featured list. 03md (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
- References need to be formatted per WP:CITE/ES to include at least publisher and access dates. References 4–11 are missing these.
- Some dates are linked while others are not; please be consistent in this. "On April 13th, a" should be "April 13" and be linked if other dates are to be linked.
- "International protests" is mostly proseline, so it doesn't flow very well. Perhaps merge some of the paragraphs to solve this.
- "Brazil - The" – if dashes are going to be used in places like this, at least make it an en dash per WP:DASH.
Gary King (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments -
- As above, websites need publisher and last access dates at the least.
- Please give the language if the source is in a non-English language.
- Please use link checker tool to check for dead links. It shows plenty.
- Ealdgyth - Talk 13:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
- Lead says it's an article, this is FLC.
- Lead is inadequate for either FL or FA.
- Not keen on the bold links.
- You haven't addressed the reference or proseline issues Gary picked up over a week ago.
- Not featured quality at all I'm afraid.
The Rambling Man (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.