Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jamelia discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:46, 25 April 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Matthewedwards : Chat
For your consideration. Matthewedwards : Chat 03:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved; article now meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 16:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes [2] reliable (looks like a official site but I'm not sure)?Dabomb87 (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.shots.net/about_shots_css.asp: It's a magazine that has been published bi monthly since 1991 by media giant EMAP. http://www.emap.com/brands/shots Matthewedwards : Chat 07:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "climbing" spelt wrong in lead
- Done
- "The song also appears Unity" - missing word
- Done
- "It is included on the soundtrack album to the feature film The Edge of Reason" => "it was...."?
- Not done using past tense would imply that it no longer features on the soundtrack, but it still does.
- "Jamelia's third and most recent album, Walk with Me was released" - missing comma after album title
- Done
- "As a collaboration" - maybe change to "In collaboration" or "Collaborations", currently the subheadings "As a solo artist"/"As a collaboration" kinda convey the bizarre sense that she was a collaboration on the tracks in question, if that makes any sense
- Done
- "(as Band Aid 20)" => "(as part of Band Aid 20)"
- Done
- Book references don't cite page numbers
- Not done unfortunately. I don't have the books to find out what page number she is listed on. There is someone on Wiki who does, but I can't remember who. {{cite book}} says only the Title is the required field; I've given more information than that, with editors, publication date, edition, and ISBN, so it's not as if it's poorly referenced or unreferenced.
Looks good other than the above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments. Sorry I'm late -- I hadn't noticed them until now. Matthewedwards : Chat 18:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all seems OK now. I didn't realise that book citations didn't require the page number. If it's of any use, in the 2005 edition of the Guinness book, she's on page 256 -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.