Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 23:07, 23 January 2012 [1].
Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jaespinoza (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is well formated and referenced, with an expanded lead providing relevant information about the award, following the path of previous Latin Grammy related featured lists. Thanks to all the reviewers for their hard work. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Comments – Couple more in addition to the ones above...
In note H, the slash in "mastering/engineer" should be removed.
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also should come before the notes.
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Giants2008 (27 and counting) 02:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
The third paragraph in the lead is very complicated and confusing. It lists 6 albums, then 4 Grammy categories, then there's a word "respectively". I don't understand what album earned the Grammy Award for Best Latin Pop Album OR what Grammy Award did the Los de Atrás Vienen Conmigo album earn?
- FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see the image of Juanes. It shows a red X to me. It's probably my browser, but still worth noting. I can see all images except this one.
- On my computer it looks good, I do not know if I have to change it.. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise all is good.--Cheetah (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
NapHit (talk) 22:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Cheetah (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No reference for note 17? Albacore (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For the other directors' sake, it appears that this was resolved in SatyrTN's review (I'm assuming that note L was meant here). Giants2008 (Talk) 19:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Parutakupiu (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments:
|
Support. Parutakupiu (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional support
- Needs a ref for note "L".
- Fixed, I added a ref. Jaespinoza (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Surely more images could be added to the right?
- Fixed, I added images for every award winner. Jaespinoza (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Fails criterion 1. Goodraise 23:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you be more specific? Is there anything wrong with the prose? Jaespinoza (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.