Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arrested Development episodes/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 07:11, 18 September 2012 [1].

List of Arrested Development episodes

Featured list candidates/List of Arrested Development episodes/archive1

Nominator(s): Wikipedical (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive, up to date, and meets all other Featured List criteria, after heavy expansion the past few days. Corresponds with other Featured Lists List of 30 Rock episodes, List of Lost episodes, List of Heroes episodes, etc. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 23:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Comments

A nomination should have three paragraphs IMO. Many paragraphs are small, and are detracting from the readability of them. Perhaps merge some.
- Actually, the featured list criteria don't say anything about how long the lead must be, although in general we don't like leads that appear stubby. WP:LEAD doesn't seem to say that all leads must be three paragraphs either; in fact, it says some should be of a lesser size if the article is short. On a glance, I don't have an issue with the size of this lead, although I agree that merging one or more paras would lead to a more attractive appearance. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - This issue does not appeared to be fixed. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - The lede has three paragraphs now; wasn't that the issue? -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yep, good now. TBran dl ey 23:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Add a thumb and a description to the lede image
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lede image should have alt text to describe what is actually in the image
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"aired" clarify that it was the original airing by making it "originally aired"
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The second paragraph of the lede shows a lot of "The first season consists of 22 episodes, which premiered on November 2, 2003 and concluded on June 6, 2004. The show's second season premiered on November 7, 2004 and concluded on April 17, 2005". All of the sentences are very simlar, making it weird/awkward to read.
- Changed. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ref should come after punctuation, ref 2 currently does not, just move it to the end of the sentence
- That ref is citing the statement in the middle of the sentence. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I know that, but, it should still be at the end of sentence. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fixed. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"has been nominated for a variety of different awards including twenty-two Primetime Emmy Awards (six wins for the series, including Outstanding Comedy Series in 2004), eight Television Critics Association Awards (three wins), three Golden Globe Awards (one win), three Writers Guild of America Awards (one win) and three Screen Actors Guild Awards." Why is there no reference for any of those awards? They have to be referenced
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"and was cancelled by Fox". When? Could you clarify please?
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"new season consisting of 10 to 13 new episodes". Remove "new" from "new episodes"; it's repetitive with "new season"
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Add plainrowheaders to the top of the series overview table
- plainrowheaders is optional, and I've chosen to leave it out as it's more consistent with other List of...episodes lists. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did it myself, due to the next edit. Other FLs were promoted before the updated guidelines were created. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
series overview table does not MOS:DTT, need to add row and colscopes to ensure it does
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did it further. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It makes more sense to place "network" under originally aired in that overview table
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"DVD release date" Missing an "s" at the endSmall text
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Episode list" → "Episodes"
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2003–2004, 2004–2005, 2005–2006, should be written as 2003–04, 2004–05, 2005–06, as per WP:YEAR
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need sentences based on what is already in that table for episodes, and is already above. You can add some parts of that (like The series' final four episodes were shown in one two-hour block against NBC's coverage of the 2006 Winter Olympics opening ceremony) to the lede, and remove from the episode list itself
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - This issue doesn't appear to be fixed. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I removed that information. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NBC, should be "National Broadcasting Company (NBC)" only on its first use, as per MOS:ACRO
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20, 21, 59, hyphens should be an en dash, per WP:DASH
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it say that "Amazon.com" and "Amazon.co.uk" are the work, when they clearly published the information
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How is "dvdloc8.com" a high-quality reliable source?
- So this is the only website that lists Region 4 dates. Should I remove Region 4 entirely? -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, don't remove. But, is there anything at EzyDVD or JB Hi-Fi. Cheers, TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I cited JB Hi-Fi, though it changed season 1's region 4 date. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref. 3: Change "Huffington Post" to "The Huffington Post", then link it
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref. 4: Link "The Huffington Post"
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ABC Medianet is the publisher, not work, for references
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Change Metro to work, then link Metro
- Done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
TV.com doesn't provide anything that isn't already in the Internet Movie Database. Perhaps replace with epguides, since it has production codes that IMDb actually don't have TBran dl ey 15:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More replies are furthermore listed above. TBran dl ey 22:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. TBran dl ey 23:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments and support! -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"22-episodes" no need for hyphen.
Is "cancelled" with two l's USEng?
"on Netflix' streaming "Netflix's"

The Rambling Man (talk) 08:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- All fixed, thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Six years after the series..." would prefer show or sitcom to series
ref 24 to 33, hyphens in date ranges should be en dashes
ref 68, is there a better source than Metro for this, its not exactly the most reputable source

NapHit (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- All done. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support NapHit (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks like this meets the criteria and all comments have been resolved. Cliff Smith 18:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since over a week ago, all issues have been addressed. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.