Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Atlanta Hawks head coaches
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:58, 3 February 2009 [1].
Been a week since my last active FLC. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 anyone? 02:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)
|
- Support - problems resolved to meet WP:WIAFL.--TRUCO 18:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- "The Atlanta Hawks are an American professional basketball team based in Atlanta, Georgia. The Hawks play"-->The Atlanta Hawks are an American professional basketball team based in Atlanta, Georgia. They play...
- "names since its inception; they were called"-->names since its inception; it was called
- "The Hawks won their
first andonly NBA championship"
- "Alex Hannum is the only head coach to have
everwon an NBA championship with the Hawks"
- "Auerbach, Holzman, and Wilkens were also named one of the top 10 coaches in NBA history in 1996."-->Auerbach, Holzman, and Wilkens were also named as 3 of the top 10 coaches in NBA history in 1996.
- Fix the dab.
- Both image captions need rewording:
- "Current head coach of the Hawks, Mike Woodson, has coached the Hawks since 2004."-->Mike Woodson has coached the team since 2004.
- "Hall of Famer Red Auerbach coached one season for the Blackhawks."-->Hall-of-Famer Red Auerbach coached the Blackhawks for one season.
- Done both, though Hall of Famer is usually spelled without dashes. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 18:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
- NBA-NBL merger? There was no such merger. Reword a little.
- Done. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 03:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply] - He's referring to the BAA-NBL merger. The resulting league was called the NBA. Zagalejo^^^ 07:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The leagues weren't merged, the NBL just defunct. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 23:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The leagues weren't merged, the NBL just defunct. -- SRE.K.A
- Done. -- SRE.K.A
- ...as 3 of the top 10 - ...as three of the top 10?
- It should be "three of the top ten" or "3 of the top 10", though I prefer the second choice. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 03:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
--Crzycheetah 03:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice seeing you back on Wikipedia. Hope you'll get your Wikiholistic ways back. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 03:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
Sorry to complicate things, but the Hawks actually started out in the NBL as the Buffalo Bisons. They moved to the Tri-Cities midseason. The Hawks' website doesn't mention this for some reason, but here are a few sources: [2], [3], [4].Zagalejo^^^ 07:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't add that part because I didn't have a reference, and they never played as the Bisons. I'll clear up the sentence just in case someone is gonna comment on that again. -- SRE.K.A[reply]nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 07:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)- Added. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 07:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Are you sure they never played as the Bisons? Where did you read that? Zagalejo^^^ 20:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the sentence. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 23:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the sentence. -- SRE.K.A
- Are you sure they never played as the Bisons? Where did you read that? Zagalejo^^^ 20:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. -- SRE.K.A
- A few more comments
The Hawks won their only NBA championship in 1958, and they have not returned to the NBA Finals since the 1960 NBA Finals. Why not just say, "they have not returned to the NBA Finals since 1960"? I don't like the repetition of NBA Finals.
Did Roger Potter coach the Hawks while the team was in the NBL? If not, the article should clarify that he was the first head coach after the team joined the NBA.
- Why not include the NBL seasons in the list? This might require some more research, but I'm pretty sure the book Total Basketball contains that information. Zagalejo^^^ 07:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Because the potential featured topic that I will be working on is List of NBA head coaches (now a redirect, so no bother wikilinking the article). If WP:NBA agrees on adding the NBL seasons, I'm fine with that, but right now, consistency is what I, and maybe the WP:NBA, want. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 08:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not that important, I guess, but other articles (eg List of Indiana Pacers head coaches) do include ABA seasons. Zagalejo^^^ 20:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it was maybe because the ABA was merged into the NBA. Also, they have an internet source for ABA seasons. If you can get references for the NBL seasons, I'll put it on the list if you really want it on the list. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 20:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it was maybe because the ABA was merged into the NBA. Also, they have an internet source for ABA seasons. If you can get references for the NBL seasons, I'll put it on the list if you really want it on the list. -- SRE.K.A
- Because the potential featured topic that I will be working on is List of NBA head coaches (now a redirect, so no bother wikilinking the article). If WP:NBA agrees on adding the NBL seasons, I'm fine with that, but right now, consistency is what I, and maybe the WP:NBA, want. -- SRE.K.A
- The second paragraph (especially the fifth sentence onward) seems a little choppy to me. Is there any way to improve the flow? Much of that information is already available in the list, so perhaps we can simplify things. You could just say, for example, that five Hawks coaches have been elected into the Hall of Fame, rather than listing all of them in the lead. Thoughts? Zagalejo^^^ 20:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's four by the way. Listing them aren't that bad, as long as it doesn't list like more than five at max. How is that going to improve the "flow" though? I'm not very experienced with the creating sentences (barely passing my English class), so any help from you would be great. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 20:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, my bad. There are five Coach of the Year winners. Anyway, we wouldn't automatically improve the flow by doing that, but we would reduce the wordage and make it easier to merge similar ideas into single sentences. I'll have to think about this a little more, though. I don't have any quick fixes in mind. Zagalejo^^^ 20:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I took a stab at it. Did I remove too much? I deleted the sentence about the coaches who have spent their entire careers with the franchise, since that's not a particularly meaningful statistic. Many of them were just interim coaches. Zagalejo^^^ 05:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think game wins is better than games won. ;b It doesn't really matter, as long as it has featured list criteria. Thanks for being dedicated to trying to make Wikipedia better! -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 anyone? 05:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think game wins is better than games won. ;b It doesn't really matter, as long as it has featured list criteria. Thanks for being dedicated to trying to make Wikipedia better! -- SRE.K.A
- It's four by the way. Listing them aren't that bad, as long as it doesn't list like more than five at max. How is that going to improve the "flow" though? I'm not very experienced with the creating sentences (barely passing my English class), so any help from you would be great. -- SRE.K.A
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.