Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Best-Selling Popular Record Albums number ones of 1945/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 08:32:06 15 July 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of Billboard Best-Selling Popular Record Albums number ones of 1945 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Lirim | Talk 08:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Following the promotion of the Billboard 200 number one list for 2001, here is the first Billboard album chart from 1945. Thank you all in advance. Lirim | Talk 08:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from ChrisTheDude
editResolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) |
---|
**"The chart was first issued in the magazine issue on March 24" - a bit mangled, maybe say "The chart was first published in the magazine dated March 24"
|
- I fixed a typo for you and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - if Best-Selling Popular Record Albums or Billboard Best-Selling Popular Record Albums doesn't exist, why is this notable? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: These articles are not needed or could be redirected to the Billboard 200 page. The chart is mentioned here in the Billboard 200 article. The page was originally titled, List of Billboard number-one albums of 1945. As the first Billboard album chart, which incoporated all genres. This should be notable.Lirim | Talk 20:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I would have thought if notable, then redirects would be there, at the very least. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Robert Wright " is piped to a redirect.
- You use "topped" five times in the lead, can you mix it up a little for less repetitive prose?
- " was certified gold " link "certified".
- Is there any reason that "Original Cast" is thus capitalised in the table?
- "18 weeks, by Capitol for 17 weeks and by RCA Victor for nine week" MOSNUM, 18/17/9 or eighteen/seventeen/nine.
- "Bing Crosby (pictured in 1951) was the only artist with two albums atop the chart." do you mean the only "solo" artist?
The Rambling Man (talk) 08:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Thank You.--Lirim | Talk 10:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
Grammar:
- Comma needed after "Best-Selling Popular Record Albums" in the first sentence.
- No comma after "three weeks" in paragraph two sentence two.
- No comma after "Glenn Miller & His Orchestra" in paragraph two sentence five.
- No comma after "album of the year" in the second-to-last sentence in the final paragraph.
Also, no images used on the page have alt text, which is needed for accessibility reasons. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 20:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @DanielleTH: Done.--Lirim | Talk 22:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Changes look great. Happy to support. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 00:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Quick commentSupport –Decca Records could use a link in the lead, unless there's one that I missed.Giants2008 (Talk) 21:12, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: Done.--Lirim | Talk 23:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from zmbro
- Kinda picky but in one instance you write out "twelve" while everywhere else you use numbers for everything above 10. I'd say "12" for consistency
- 9 should be spelled out per MOS:NUMS
- The bottom 2 images seem a little big to me.
Sorry this has been up so long. Should have my support soon! – zmbro (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Zmbro: Thank you. The Rambling Man, critizied that the numbers all need the same format, so I didn't change it.--Lirim | Talk 06:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Good for me. Great job to you! – zmbro (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – All of the references are reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker tool shows no problems. Everything looks good on the sourcing front. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I have found and fixed two redirects in the lead and see also section and also fixed missing dot. Whole table should be checked at an angle of redirects. Eurohunter (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter: I found one redirect in the table and removed it. Thank you.--Lirim | Talk 01:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting! --PresN 08:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.