Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1980/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 17:19:07 28 October 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1980 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A total of 32 of these annual country #1 lists are now at FL and another seems on course, so here is the next in the series, covering a year in which none other than Clint Eastwood had a chart-topper. As ever your comments will be welcomed and acted upon promptly..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Aoba47
edit
- It may be helpful to make this part (all three singles spending three consecutive weeks at number one.) into its own sentence with something like (All three singles spent three consecutive weeks at number one.) since the sentence is already pretty dense with information from introducing four different song titles and two singers.
- Reference 8 leads to a dead page (i.e. "page not found"). I would recommend archiving all the references if possible to avoid link rot and death.
Otherwise, everything looks good. Once both comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the long sentence, replaced the dead ref -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the long sentence, replaced the dead ref -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Good for me. Great job as always. – zmbro (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything looks good, I support the move, but as suggested by the other editor try to archive the citations, it will be better. Dey subrata (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – I spot checked a few refs and all look good. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – I see no issues.Lirim | Talk 18:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to note, I'm going to be away until next Saturday. If any new issues are raise here, I'll address them then..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review: The sources are all reliable and properly formatted. My issue with reference 8 has been addressed during my prose review. From my spot-checks, all the information seems to be properly supported with the citations so this passes my source review. Aoba47 (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting another one. --PresN 17:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.