Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article deserves to be a featured list. Made the list in accordance with the FL criteria. So, I am glad to present it for review and looking forward to your feedback. RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- " In a T20I, each team plays single innings," => " In a T20I, each team plays a single innings,"
- "The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match as well as any T20I match was" => "The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match, as well as in any T20I match, was"
- "who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup till date" => "who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs, recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup to date" ("till date" is not an expression in English)
- "He set the remarkable record" - calling it remarkable is not WP:NPOV
- "Rangana Herath's fifer against New Zealand on 31 March 2014, is" - no reason for that comma to be there
- "Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan is the first player" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan was the first player"
- "on T20 World Cup debut" => "on his T20 World Cup debut"
- Image caption: "Mujeeb Ur Rahman is the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman was the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on his ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut." (note the full stop at the end) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all the issues you raised. Waiting for your further review or opinion. RoboCric (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Harrias
edit- "..with bowling figures of 5 wickets for 6 runs.." Explain what this means, and consider linking to Bowling analysis.
- "..the first player from associate nations to.." This would seem better as "..the first player from an associate nation to.."
- "Rangana Herath's fifer against.." "fifer" isn't encyclopaedic language.
- "He grabbed five wickets conceding.." Similarly, in this context, "grabbed" isn't encyclopaedic language.
- "He averaged 0.60 in that match, which is also the best average for.." Provide the wikilink on the first, not second, use of "average" here.
- Be consistent throughout the article whether to use numbers or words for the number of wickets.
- In the table, large and well-known cities such as London, Perth, Chittagong, Kolkata etc shouldn't be linked, per the MOS.
- The "Season overview" table needs row scopes.
- Both images need appropriate and descriptive alt text.
That's it from me. Harrias (he/him) • talk 13:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose – no response from the nominator in four weeks, and concerns remain unresolved. Harrias (he/him) • talk 07:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Harrias Done, I have fixed all the issues. I am really really sorry that I was very late. Actually I was completely out of online for 60 days due to my training purposes. I admit that it was my fault. I should have given a pre-notice here about my unavailability/wiki-break. I would be careful about this from the next time. Now I hope that you would reconsider about your opinion regarding this list. RoboCric Let's chat 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Harrias: Do you still oppose this nomination? --PresN 17:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Harrias Done, I have fixed all the issues. I am really really sorry that I was very late. Actually I was completely out of online for 60 days due to my training purposes. I admit that it was my fault. I should have given a pre-notice here about my unavailability/wiki-break. I would be careful about this from the next time. Now I hope that you would reconsider about your opinion regarding this list. RoboCric Let's chat 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – Pending
editWill do soon. Aza24 (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Formatting
- Dating missing for SportsAustralia ref 1
- Page number missing for ref 5
- Date missing in ref 7
- Author & date missing in ref 8
- Date missing in ref 9
- Date missing ref 10
- Author & date missing in ref 11
- Author & date missing ref 13
- Date missing ref 15
- Date missing in ref 20, Daily sun
- Date (& editor?) missing in ref 23, India Today (scroll to bottom of the page)
- Reliability
- ref 17, Sportskeeda, is not a reliable source. Should be switched
- Looks okay otherwise
- Verifiability
- Spotchecked a few. Found no issues – Aza24 (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, again I am coming very late online. Sorry to say I won't be able to fix it for next 1 month. I will try if i get onlin. Pls wait for some time with patience. RoboCric Let's chat 04:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, but your nomination has been here for 4 months with one support and one oppose. I would recommend you consider asking it is archived if you don't have to time to pursue it at the moment. You can always renominate it. Aza24 (talk) 17:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, again I am coming very late online. Sorry to say I won't be able to fix it for next 1 month. I will try if i get onlin. Pls wait for some time with patience. RoboCric Let's chat 04:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.