Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ISS spacewalks/archive1
Just trying to get a variety of lists on this page; if there are little things that need to be fixed please don't vote oppose, but rather tell me so I can fix it...
Phoenix2 4th of July! 00:53 (UTC)
Comment Very nice, will support once a reference section is added--Sophitus July 4, 2005 04:02 (UTC)Support - good enough for me, but could the reference link directly to info on ISS spacewalks at the Nasa site, rather than the Nasa homepage.--Sophitus July 5, 2005 06:10 (UTC)- Thanks, once again all I did was reformat the list, but I assume that the information can be found at the NASA website or something similar.
Phoenix2 4th of July! 16:07 (UTC) - I got the reference in there, and had to remove the template {{TOCright}} because it is now proposed for deletion. Also, I narrowed the Duration column by two percent and added that to the last column. Phoenix2 4th of July! 16:28 (UTC)
- I'll change the reference link. Phoenix2 5 July 2005 15:35 (UTC)
- Thanks, once again all I did was reformat the list, but I assume that the information can be found at the NASA website or something similar.
- Support, subject to the following comments: some proper references are needed (the NASA homepage is not sufficient); in addition, it would help for more of the missions were wikilinked (Unity? PMA-3? Z1 truss? etc.); finally, is there anything wrong with the usual TOC? There are only 6 headings. If the TOC creates too much whitespace, place the image immediately before the first heading to fill the space (although you may need a <br clear=all> to avoid crashing into the first table). -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 12:30 (UTC)
- No, there's nothing really wrong with the usual TOC, I was just testing out that kind. It wouldn't be a problem to put in a normal TOC to be consistent with other Wikipedia articles. Phoenix2 5 July 2005 15:35 (UTC)
- Support assuming revert to standard wiki TOC -- Ian ≡ talk 09:41, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Support, and just to be contrary, I like the TOC on the right. (support not conditional on it however.) Dsmdgold 03:40, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
- No your not really being contrary because I had a custom table of contents in a kind of line format, {{TOCright}} was on templates for deletion, which is one of the reasons I removed it in the first place, but that is irrelevent since it survived the vote. Anyway, I replaced TOCright. Phoenix2 04:29, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
- TOCright looks good to me, I just didn't like the line version. - Ian ≡ talk 04:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
- No your not really being contrary because I had a custom table of contents in a kind of line format, {{TOCright}} was on templates for deletion, which is one of the reasons I removed it in the first place, but that is irrelevent since it survived the vote. Anyway, I replaced TOCright. Phoenix2 04:29, July 13, 2005 (UTC)