Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Indian Premier League five-wicket hauls/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 23:07, 2 November 2012 [1].

List of Indian Premier League five-wicket hauls

edit

List of Indian Premier League five-wicket hauls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the criteria. We have tons of FL regarding individual fifers, we recently promoted a FL about stadium fifers, but this one will be the first FL about tournament fifers. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revolved comments from NapHit (talk) 12:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "the only franchises that have not had a player take a five-wicket haul for them are Pune Warriors India and Kochi Tuskers Kerala." -> Pune Warriors and Kochi Tuskers Kerala are the only franchises, from which a player has not taken a five-wicket haul
  • done But kept it "Pune Warriors India" only.
  • "The first five-wicket haul in the IPL was scored" scored is not the best here and don't to mention IPL as its obvious its referring to IPL as that is what the list is about. I would re-jig the sentence so it reads like this: The first five-wicket haul was taken by Sohail Tanvir of the Rajasthan Royals against the Chennai Super Kings on 4 May 2008 done
  • "Tanvir took six wickets giving away fourteen runs..." -> Tanvir took six wickets for fourteen runs done
  • The most recent five-wicket haul was taken by Sunil Narine of Kolkata Knight Riders while playing against the Kings XI Punjab at Kolkata on 15 April 2012." need to add the before Kolkata Knight Riders as well  Done
  • provide a link for economy rate to help those unfamiliar with cricket terminology done
  • "who claimed five wicket" wicket should be wickets done
  • "None of the bowlers have taken two five-wicket hauls." -> No bowler has taken two-five wicket-hauls done
  • "Two five wicket hauls have been taken in Feroz Shah Kotla and Punjab Cricket Association Stadium each" -> Two five-wicket hauls have been taken at the Feroz Shah Kotla Ground and Punjab Cricket Association stadium. Also the Feroz link goes to an archaeological monument not a ground done
  • "49 four-wicket hauls have been taken in the competition, and thirteen of them were taken in less than 4 overs." -> 49 four-wicket hauls have been taken in the competition, 13 of which were taken in less than 4 overs. done

NapHit (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "This is regarded as a notable achievement" by who?
  • By everyone. It is a notable thing and guys often record this in statistics.
  • "are the only franchises from which a player has not taken a five-wicket haul" I don't understand that
  •  Done Changed "from" to "for"
  • The key table doesn't meet MOS:ACCESS, add scope cols and rows to ensure it does  Done
  • That same table doesn't meet MOS:BOLD, add plainrowheaders to the table's coding to fix the concern  Done
  • In notes, why are the letters written differently
  • I have selected the lower-greek option. They are visible in all browsers (except IE6 or below)
  • I think you can removed the mobile link to the website, in external links, as the reader can get there from that website, etc., as per WP:ELNO
  • Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order  Done

TBrandley 23:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Would use encyclopedic language in Kumble's caption (i.e. "five-wicket haul" in preference to "fifer").  Done
  • Particularly since the caption is an almost verbatim copy of the lead!  Done
  • "None of the bowlers..." perhaps "No bowlers have taken a five-wicket haul in the IPL."?  Done
  • "49 four-wicket hauls have..." don't start sentences with a number.  Done
  • "taken in less than 4 overs" fewer than four.  Done
  • Morne Morkel has a diacritic.  Done
  • I would have thought Kumble's average (of 1.00 for five wickets!) is far more notable than an economy of 1.57 runs per over.
  • This fifer is know more for being the most economical one rather than being the best average one.
  • In refs, you sometimes link Cricinfo, and you sometimes don't. Be consistent.  Done
  • Ext link, no need for Mobile to be capitalised.

The Rambling Man (talk) 14:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revolved comments from Zia Khan 04:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments–
  • its first edition in 2008.[7] → link it to 2008 season  Done
  • for consistency use either fifer, five-for or five-wicket haul, try to avoid using the 3  Done
  • Link Kings XI Punjab at first usage  Done
  • "No bowlers have taken a five-wicket haul in the IPL.[1]" what does this means? I really can't understand this.  Done
  • "None of the bowlers has taken two five-wicket haul in the IPL." → s after haul  Done
  • "Kings XI Punjab have had the highest number of five-wicket hauls, with three.[12]" → perhaps "against them" before comma  Done
  • Ref# 7 and 11 need publishers/authors
  • For consistency link ESPNcricinfo and NDTV India
  •  Done However ESPNcricinfo is already linked at its first usage (in the caption)
  • Remove text at the end of the template
  • "uniyal" at the end of the list???

Zia Khan 22:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Indian_Premier_League_five-wicket_hauls/archive1&oldid=1138482636"