Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2019)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2019) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Explicit (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the fifth list in this series that I am nominating for FL. The format is similar to the previous lists that have been promoted in this series. -- EN-Jungwon 11:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- "Inkigayo implemented modifications for its measurements of albums" => "Inkigayo implemented modifications to its measurements of albums"
- "Chae-yeon was later replaced by actress Shin Eun-soo starting the February 17 broadcast." => "Chae-yeon was replaced by actress Shin Eun-soo starting with the February 17 broadcast."
- "Two other soloist had" => "Two other soloists had"
- "Singer Taeyeon had two singles rank number one on the chart in 2019;" - semi-colon at the end should be a colon (:)
- "The latter of which went on to" => "The latter of these went on to" (you can't use "which" in that way if you have started a new sentence)
- Itzy and Dalla Dalla are overlinked in the lead
- "making Itzy the artist" => "making Itzy the act" ("artist" can only be used to refer to soloists)
- "formed through the and fourth seasons" - is there a word missing there?
- "with their debut single "Flash" September 8" => "with their debut single "Flash" on September 8"
- That's it, I think! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude, all done. Thanks as always. -- EN-Jungwon 00:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You now have "X1, formed through the fourth seasons of Produce 101 gained" - were they formed through just the fourth season? If so, remove the s from seasons. Oh, and you need a comma after produce 101 to end the clause -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude, thanks for catching that. It has now been fixed. -- EN-Jungwon 23:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You now have "X1, formed through the fourth seasons of Produce 101 gained" - were they formed through just the fourth season? If so, remove the s from seasons. Oh, and you need a comma after produce 101 to end the clause -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "May 5" doesn't sort properly in the table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @MPGuy2824 fixed. Should the song "%% (Eung Eung)" sort under "Eung Eung"? -- EN-Jungwon 01:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should the song "%% (Eung Eung)" sort under "Eung Eung"?
I'm not sure, but my gut says yes.
- Support on table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @MPGuy2824 fixed. Should the song "%% (Eung Eung)" sort under "Eung Eung"? -- EN-Jungwon 01:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Alavense
edit- till October 6, 2019 - The "2019" isn't needed there.
- IU had two singles rank at number one achieved with "Love Poem" and "Blueming". The latter of these went on to achieve a triple crown in December. Girl group Itzy achieved their first ever number one on the chart with their debut single "Dalla Dalla" - Three "achieve"s in three sentences.
- They previously accomplished the distinction the previous year with "Starry Night" - "They had previously accomplished" maybe?
- Other first time number ones - "first-time".
That's what I saw, EN-Jungwon. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pinging @EN-Jungwon as a casual follow up about this. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Alavense @Hey man im josh all done. Thanks for the reminder. -- EN-Jungwon 01:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the edits and nice work. Support. Alavense (talk) 05:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Alavense @Hey man im josh all done. Thanks for the reminder. -- EN-Jungwon 01:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dank
edit- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- Additional disclaimer: I can't read Korean.
- "Two other soloists had more than one number one single in 2019. Singer Taeyeon had two singles rank number one on the chart in 2019: "Four Seasons" in April and "Spark" in November. IU had two singles rank at number one achieved with "Love Poem" and "Blueming"." Redundancy isn't a sin, but I think there's too much of it here. I suggest something like this: Two other soloists had more than one number one single in 2019: Taeyeon, with "Four Seasons" and "Spark", and IU, with "Love Poem" and "Blueming". [include the links]
- "Their succeeding single "Icy"": Articles on Wikipedia, especially articles about songs, are much more likely to use "succeeding" to mean "being successful", and I don't think that's what you mean here ... you mean it was their second single, right?
- Did you decide how you want to sort "%% (Eung Eung)" in the table? I see that was discussed above.
- Checking the FLC criteria:
- 1. Apart from those points, nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
- 6. It is stable. - Dank (push to talk) 02:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008 and EN-Jungwon: Giants, I'm in the middle of something ... I see that my comments weren't actioned, so I need to take another look at this later today. - Dank (push to talk) 21:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dank, All done. I'm very sorry for taking so long to reply. Thanks for reviewing this list. Really appreciate it. -- EN-Jungwon 13:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. It's not even a small problem ... I just wanted someone to look at this before it got promoted. All good. - Dank (push to talk) 14:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dank, All done. I'm very sorry for taking so long to reply. Thanks for reviewing this list. Really appreciate it. -- EN-Jungwon 13:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Explicit:, since you're co-nomming ... I see that Jungwon hasn't edited since Sept. 5. What did you think of my first 3 points ... agree, disagree? - Dank (push to talk) 22:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – The references appear to be reliable and well-formatted overall, and the link-checker tool shows no concerns. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.