Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Kingdom Hearts media
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 11 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Crzycheetah 07:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article was recently an article about the Kingdom Hearts manga that is related to the Kingdom Hearts video game series. It was switched to a list format in order to encompass all the related media of the series since the manga article looked like it wasn't making any real progress. Myself and other editors feel that it detailed enough and currently complete. New media is planned to be added as it is released. (Guyinblack25 talk 00:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Co-nom and support, I also feel this list is ready to be featured. I will be here to help address any concerns raised by other editors. Axem Titanium 00:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support nicely done, as good as the FF one. igordebraga ≠ 17:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Much better than the FF one (which contains two stub sections). Kariteh 18:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion regarding use of non-free images
Reluctant oppose: decorative images of Game and CD covers used. The books are okay because this article is the main one to cover them, but the games and CDs are not. Circeus 02:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Solved Circeus 18:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]- I'll remove the game and CD covers but would it be okay to add a few more book covers since the game/CD covers would be gone? Axem Titanium 02:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd stick with images already used in other articles. Given the topic at hand, the absence of images wouldn't be a reason to oppose anyway. Circeus 03:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Can you explain? Axem Titanium 16:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean, "don't add extra images just for the list; only use images already used elsewhere." Our fair use criteria state that copyrighted material should be kept to a minimum, and not used in a "decorative" manner, and it's practically impossible to argue against the anti-FU when it comes down to lists (this is why we don't have any screenshot in episode lists anymore).Circeus 17:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Can you explain? Axem Titanium 16:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd stick with images already used in other articles. Given the topic at hand, the absence of images wouldn't be a reason to oppose anyway. Circeus 03:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Would it be alright if we kept one picture for the games and soundtracks in a similar manner to the manga and novels? (Guyinblack25 talk 16:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Following from Guy's comment, I've cut it down to 4 images with one for each super-section. Is this alright? Axem Titanium 17:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it works. Circeus 17:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool, so do you still oppose? Axem Titanium 18:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it works. Circeus 17:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Following from Guy's comment, I've cut it down to 4 images with one for each super-section. Is this alright? Axem Titanium 17:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll remove the game and CD covers but would it be okay to add a few more book covers since the game/CD covers would be gone? Axem Titanium 02:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, but can those darkened cells be dealt with text content (e.g. m-dashes or "unreleased") instead of looking like big blotches on the page? Circeus 18:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The guy from peer review suggested that but I've changed it, since it makes you happy. Axem Titanium 18:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If it comes up again, you can point toward Wikipedia:Accessibility: "Ensure that color is not the only way used to convey important information" (mostly, there's also the fact that empty cells do not actually provide the information for screen readers). Circeus 04:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, sure. For next time. Axem Titanium 04:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If it comes up again, you can point toward Wikipedia:Accessibility: "Ensure that color is not the only way used to convey important information" (mostly, there's also the fact that empty cells do not actually provide the information for screen readers). Circeus 04:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The guy from peer review suggested that but I've changed it, since it makes you happy. Axem Titanium 18:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]