Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Mexican National Trios Champions/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 20:47, 16 June 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): MPJ-DK (talk) 11:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured list candidates/List of Mexican National Trios Champions/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Mexican National Trios Champions/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it is up to the standards of Featured Lists. It was listed once before but due to one editor it was closed and not promoted even though all issues were either addressed or needed to be clarified by the FL-Reviewer. I believe this is ready. MPJ-DK (talk) 11:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Review by Truco (talk · contribs)
|
- Support after 2 full reviews; meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 21:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comments
- "wins" - why the quotation marks?
- As above, it's not actually won - the results are pre-determined so no one technically wins the title. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't it be better to say, "the title is awarded to the chosen champion after the match is finished to maintain..."?--Crzycheetah 18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As above, it's not actually won - the results are pre-determined so no one technically wins the title. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am still not satisfied with the prose in the lead, but I can't help. I'll reserve my judgment after someone with copyeditting skills reviews this page.
- "wins" - why the quotation marks?
--Crzycheetah 18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well there is an alternative, in quite a few FLs the concept is described in a different way, would this be better?:
- Title reigns are determined either by professional wrestling matches between different wrestlers involved in pre-existing scripted feuds, plots, and storylines, or by scripted circumstances. Wrestlers were portrayed as either villains or heroes as they followed a series of tension-building events, which culminated in a wrestling match or series of matches for the championship.
- That one was made by SRX just for everyone to know. There is one I came up with that is a bit smaller that goes directly to the point which I use in the main championship article since I haven't tested it out that much yet but hasn't gotten any complants by users yet. It is this: Being a professional wrestling championship it is not won legitimately; it is instead won via a scripted ending to a match or awarded to a wrestler because of a storyline.--WillC 07:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I like that one, I've used it in this article, hopefully it meets with approval, thank you Will. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That one was made by SRX just for everyone to know. There is one I came up with that is a bit smaller that goes directly to the point which I use in the main championship article since I haven't tested it out that much yet but hasn't gotten any complants by users yet. It is this: Being a professional wrestling championship it is not won legitimately; it is instead won via a scripted ending to a match or awarded to a wrestler because of a storyline.--WillC 07:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Title reigns are determined either by professional wrestling matches between different wrestlers involved in pre-existing scripted feuds, plots, and storylines, or by scripted circumstances. Wrestlers were portrayed as either villains or heroes as they followed a series of tension-building events, which culminated in a wrestling match or series of matches for the championship.
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. MPJ-DK (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008
|
---|
Comments –
|
Support – Took a while to get this one up to scratch, but I believe it's there now. Giants2008 (17-14) 22:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.