Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk), Ladidadida123 (talk) and Ïvana (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This list contains the winners of Music Bank in 2021. This is my second FLC nomination. I had previously nominated the 2020 list which is now a featured list. I have expanded the article in the past few days and believe that the article now meets the FL criteria. I added Ladidadida123 and Ïvana as nominators since they have significantly contributed to this article. -- EN-Jungwon 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"a methodology that had been used since November 2020" => "a methodology that has been used since November 2020"
|
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by RunningTiger123
editResolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
* "Music Bank Chart" should not be bolded in lead per MOS:TITLEABSENTBOLD
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by Z1720
- "The chart includes digital performance on domestic online music services" I think performance should be performances
- Done.
- "and viewers' choice (10%)," How is this determined? That should be added to the article
- Done.
- The two notes should be cited
- @Z1720 is it a problem if I add citations for the first note into the reference column in the table since that note is used in multiple rows. -- EN-Jungwon 17:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It's fine for me, but it might get challenged at a later date. Z1720 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Image check: licencing is fine. All the images are YouTube screenshots and are licenced under there CC fair use.
- Don't use fixed px size, use |upright instead
- Done.
- Source check: pass. Formatting seems fine.
- Spot check version checked: [2]. I don't read Korean so I checked the English sources.
- Ref 6: I could not verify most of the information at the end of the second paragraph of the lede. Is there a citation missing?
- Done.
- No concerns with Ref 9
- Ref 6: I could not verify most of the information at the end of the second paragraph of the lede. Is there a citation missing?
Please ping me when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 12:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. My concerns have been addressed. Z1720 (talk) 15:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – I'm not too familiar with either Korean news sites or K-pop sites, but I didn't see anything alarming in terms of source reliability.
One issue with reference formatting should be addressed: ref 7 (from NME) has some weirdness where the latter part of the citation is being italicized. It looks like you have an extra quotation mark at the end of the title; I'd suggest removing that and seeing if it helps.Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]- @Giants2008 fixed the citation. You can see WP:KO/RS for a list of reliable Korean sources. -- EN-Jungwon 12:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- With that issue resolved and a spot-check having been done earlier, I'd say the source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008 fixed the citation. You can see WP:KO/RS for a list of reliable Korean sources. -- EN-Jungwon 12:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 19:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.