Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members/archive3
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 20:51, 14 July 2010 [1].
List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): WereWolf (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I have worked extremely hard on it. I have used reliable sources for each citation, uploaded numerous photos of the band members, rewrote the entire lead, added the infobox, and resolved all of the comments that were brought up in the previous nomination. I strongly believe that this list does meet all of the criteria, and I am confident that the third time is the charm for this list. Thank you, WereWolf (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:24, 15:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments:
Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:15, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support a patient and understanding editor who takes criticism positively and produces good work. Could we ask for anything more? I doubt it. A pleasure to work with, well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I don't like the blogspot-ref, but since the claim is supported by two other refs it isn't much of a problem. Tooga - BØRK! 18:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't mind removing the blogspot ref. WereWolf (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case I think it should be removed and the text adapted to the contents of the two other refs. However, my support stands either way. Tooga - BØRK! 20:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. WereWolf (talk) 20:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case I think it should be removed and the text adapted to the contents of the two other refs. However, my support stands either way. Tooga - BØRK! 20:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.