Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Leicestershire/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Leicestershire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is the latest in my nominations of lists of Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and is in the same format as FLs such as Suffolk and Essex. Dudley Miles (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from BeatlesLedTV
- Make sure you spell out numbers in the lead per MOS:NUM. Mainly just seven and twelve.
- Put a period at the end of the caption in the opening stream image.
Not going to lie that's all I got for you. Another great list Dudley great job! Care to check out my other FLCs? BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Both done. Thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Absolutely. Happy to support. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments I've reviewed quite a few of these lists and each time there are fewer comments to make as they are at featured quality already. Just a few quibbles:
- "15% of UK output". I think this could use rewording. For example: "15% of the total production of rock in the United Kingdom." Or something a bit more clear. Is "rock" the best term for the mineral extracted from this quarry?
- Revised but did not repeat "rock" as that would make three times in two sentences. The source says crushed rock used for the foundations of roads and buildings, so it is not one specific mineral. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Batenus livens and anthribus fasciatus... Capitalization should be consistent throughout the article
- "have diverse butterflies" -> "have diverse species of butterflies"?
- These are just minor, I will alredy Support this list based on my review. Mattximus (talk) 14:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your review and support. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.