Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Rutland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the latest in my nominations of Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and is in the same format as FLCs such as Northamptonshire and Suffolk. I trust that this list will also be found to be of FLC standard. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments from BeatlesLedTV
That's all I got. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Nope I got nothing else for you. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Rodw
Another nice list and comments from previous FLC nominations have been taken into account. Just a couple of minor questions:
In the description of Clipsham Old Quarry and Pickworth Great Wood we have "Bajocian Middle and Upper Jurassic". I would have said " Middle Bajocian and Upper Jurassic"
- Upper is an error and I have deleted it.
In Eye Brook Reservoir would it be worth wikilinking wigeon, teal, mallard and pochard?
In Shacklewell Hollow would it be worth wikilinking Alder for those not familiar with the species?
- I am doubtful. Alder is about the genus and the source does not specify the species. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Is Anglicans online (Ref 1) the best source for the fact Rutland is a ceremonial county?
- It is the only one I could find. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- How about this BBC story or this book (intro page)?— Rod talk 16:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- They are both OK but what makes them better than Anglicans online, which seems marginally closer to being an official source? Dudley Miles (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose I'm thinking "user generated" for Anglicans online - but I could be wrong. Something like the London Gazette or a county council publication would be ideal.— Rod talk 17:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It is published by the Society of Archbishop Justus, so maybe I should have shown it as the publisher and Anglicans online as the website. Would that be better? I could not find an official source, a common problem as official sources often do not bother to spell out 'obvious' basic details. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep adding the publisher would work for me.— Rod talk 20:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can we provide a ref for Seaton Meadows being designated "Plantlife" (is this a designation or is this who owns/manages it - might be better in description).
- It is the manager and I have added the ref omitted in error. I think it is better to keep it in this column with the other managers. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As usual - minor quibbles.— Rod talk 09:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Many Thanks for your review. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for tweaks. I can now Support this list as meeting the criteria.— Rod talk 21:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- BeatlesLedTV and Rodw do you have any further comments? Dudley Miles (talk) 13:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
That's all I have, a typically excellent piece of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 16:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.