Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of South Park episodes/archive3

List of South Park episodes

Redlinks are gone, column widths are consistant, Lede expanded, references cited, ALL images now have sources cited and the correct license tag. And it complies better with Wikipedia:WikiProject List of Television Episodes. See previous nominations here and here

Support Discordance 21:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stropng oppose per lack of fair use rationale in screenshots. This was also in one of the previous nominations of this very article. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 22:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry my bad missed that bit, I may be able to write the rationales over the next few days. Perhaps I should withdraw the nomination till then Discordance 22:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment List of Oh My Goddess episodes does not have fair use rationales yet it is a featured list. I am willing to take the time to write the rationales for South Park but surely someone needs to do it for Oh My Goddess Discordance 22:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - During that nomination the screenshots were taken down, since they were purely decorative and the author refused to write rationales for them. I don't know about the rest of the images since I stopped following the nomination at some point. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 23:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - It is only a small number of DVD covers now it shouldn't take long for the editors to write the rationales. I left a note on Goddess's talk page Discordance 00:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have writen rationales for the two shorts and season 1, are they suitable? do i need to be more specific in the rationale what points of the plot the picture deals wirh? please read the plot summaries and the image summaries carefully as they tie in. can someone comment please Discordance 02:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - previous nom here -- ALoan (Talk) 12:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Impressive collection of decorative screenshots you've got there. Too bad that's not allowed by the fair use policy. --Carnildo 19:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Carnildo as above please read the fair use rationales. I have ensured that all the pictures in season 1 help identify characters mentioned in the plot outline or illustrate the plot outline. This complies with the fair use policy and they are no longer merely 'decorative'. I still need to do this for the rest of the article so i agree it is not yet ready to be a featured list I jumped the gun a bit. If you find my fair use rationales for season 1 unacceptable i would like to hear why so i can improve them. Discordance 21:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Assuming that each screenshot shows the major characters for the episode, I guess that'll do. I'm still not too happy with it. --Carnildo 04:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find it ridiculous that people oppose this nomination because of such utter technicalities. Grue 20:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I beg to differ. Please read Wikipedia:Fair_use#Fair_use_policy, specifically point 10. Having said that, I've gone through the rationales of the screenshots of season 1 and believe they are sufficient. Of course Discordance still has a lot of work to do :-S -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 01:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object - copyright status is a critical issue for a list with as many images as this. -- ALoan (Talk) 01:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC) A fair use rationale has been added for each image, so I won't oppose, but I am still slightly concerned at whether the added rationales are sufficient. I will let the copyright experts decide. -- ALoan (Talk) 15:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - really one of the best lists. Super nice, and the pics really help to identify the episodes (I am an occasional South Park viewer; very nice picks!). Just write up those rationales. Renata 08:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The rationales are now done, every single image on the page Discordance 10:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job! -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 12:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks but id like to say the majority of the work had been done by Sfufan2005. Thank you for your work on this article! Discordance 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]