Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Tranmere Rovers F.C. players/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 11:45, 8 April 2012 [1].
List of Tranmere Rovers F.C. players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): U+003F? 15:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list as part of a fun mission getting the Tranmere family of articles to a better standard (than the team). This list recently had a positive peer review, and seems of a comparable standard to the recent list on Watford (unlike the team). Hope you enjoy the read! U+003F? 15:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "It includes first-team appearances and goals in the in The Football League" - bit of a stutter there
- "have been expunged from the records are are not included" - duplicate word
- Image of Peter Farrell is non-free and does not have a FUR for this article
Done Shame, nice photo. The list is short on images now, I'll dig out some more. U+003F? 13:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- a few more pics in there now. U+003F? 23:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That's about all I could find. I haven't checked that all the links point to the right articles..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- One more comment
- The lead image can and probably should be larger -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 01:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support assuming... the image issues brought up by Goodraise are dealt with. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Struway2 (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments. Encouraging to see that this list had a decent peer review.
hope some of this helps, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments'
NapHit (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review:
For File:Tranmere Rovers 27 August 1921.jpg, File:Johnny Campbell.jpg, File:Jimmy Moreton.jpg, and File:Tommy Stuart.jpg, "please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was."Goodraise 22:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Additional comment: This is only necessary because the images are hosted on Commons (as opposed to images stored locally in the database of the English Wikipedia). As far as the English Wikipedia is concerned, these images appear to be free enough and properly tagged. Goodraise 20:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done I think. I must confess I wasn't entirely sure what was wanted here. Are those descriptions sufficient, would you say? U+003F? 17:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- {{PD-UK-unknown}} can only be used if "the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry." At this point, I'm not convinced that you have exhausted all reasonable means. Somebody may still hold the copyright for these pictures, and that's not acceptable. Then again, I'm not an expert on UK copyright law. You could ask (for example at Commons:Village Pump) for input from someone more knowledgeable. Goodraise 20:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. As suggested, I've brought it up there. U+003F? 15:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done There was no clear consensus over on commons -- some thought {{PD-UK-unknown}} appropriate and some not. Thus I've duplicated the images locally, using {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} which is definitely acceptable. U+003F? 12:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Revisited. Goodraise 16:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. As suggested, I've brought it up there. U+003F? 15:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- {{PD-UK-unknown}} can only be used if "the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry." At this point, I'm not convinced that you have exhausted all reasonable means. Somebody may still hold the copyright for these pictures, and that's not acceptable. Then again, I'm not an expert on UK copyright law. You could ask (for example at Commons:Village Pump) for input from someone more knowledgeable. Goodraise 20:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.